"Why should I appear in any court in the Republic of Ireland when the
grossly corrupt Republic of Ireland's legal system is failing to provide the
'minimum' facilities required by its 'European Convention on Human Rights Act
legal representative"by W. Finnerty. Thu Nov 22, 2007
"If NO legal representative
will entertain you that is their business." (From Wed Nov 21, 2007 23:18
So how does the statement above fit in with Article
6.3.b of the "European Convention on Human Rights Act 2003" (Republic of
Ireland), which reads as follows:
"to have adequate time and facilities for the
preparation of his defence"
How am I supposed to
prepare my defence if I cannot find a lawyer who is willing to help me? In other
words, the MINIMUM "facilities" specified by the Act are simply not there, in
any shape or form - whose "business" is that?
Article 6.3.c - which in part reads:
"to defend himself
in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing
What choice do I have? - if I cannot find a lawyer who
is willing to take on my case?
Why should I appear in any
court in the Republic of Ireland when the grossly corrupt Republic of Ireland's
legal system is failing to provide the "minimum" facilities required by its
"European Convention on Human Rights Act 2003"? "Step into
my parlour said the spider to the fly"
- and "NO
I think the BEST decision I
made in all of this was to get well away from the corrupt thugs who are running
the Republic of Ireland's legal system, and to show them up all over the world
for what they are (on the Internet).
"The opera ain't
over 'til the fat lady stops singing."
I think it's a bit too
soon yet to predict the final outcome of my exposure (on the Internet) of these
revolting thugs. There are a lot of people visiting the web site at the address
below, and I would not be in the least bit surprised if the reputation of our
Chief Justice John L. Murray is already in tatters.
can Mr Murray (and his senior lawyer colleagues) EVER be seen to be credible
again? - when the mountain of corruption they have enmeshed themselves in means
they cannot answer the registered letter at the address below: without making
their own position many times worse - and which may of course explain why they
are now WHOLLY dependant on the likes of you to flood the whole stinking rotten
situation with piles and piles of lies and nonsense (from behind the cowardly
protection of a pseudonym): for the purpose of covering up the IMPOSSIBLE
situation they find themselves in regarding all the unconstitutional (i.e.
ILLEGAL) legislation they have knowingly produced during the past several
Among other things, they'll now go down in
history as the bunch of corrupt lawyers PRIMARILY responsible for destroying
some of the nation's most important heritage sites (at Tara): through the use of
the illegal law they have produced and sustained.
problems I know - but I see them as very small compared to the ones that
Chief Justice Murray
and President Mary McAleese
You ask me why "they" have not tried to extradite
I'll tell you why: BECAUSE THEY ARE AFRAID TO
They know perfectly well what would happen if
they tried to extradite me (and I suspect you do as well): they would bring the
roof down on top of themselves, and well they know
Corrupt, disgusting, revolting they may be, but
stupid they are not. Related link: http://www.europeancourtofhumanrightswilliamfinnerty.com/ChiefJusticeMurray/28August2007/Letter.htm
(Tiny URL: http://tinyurl.com/yu5jpl
text has been copied from the following Indymedia (Ireland)
(Tiny URL: http://tinyurl.com/29krbw
Copy addresses and emails from any email account to Yahoo! Mail - quick, easy