========================
 
Time the fat-cat "Lawyers and Bankers" were challenged?
by W. Finnerty.  Thu May 31, 2007 14:14
 
My research over the past several years suggests the damage and destruction ancient heritage sites in the Republic of Ireland are being subjected to is being done with the full support of senior members of the legal profession; and, that without such support, the damage and destruction in question could not possibly be happening on the scale that it is, and for so long.
 
Basically, and by both "deed and omission", the lawyers have produced unconstitutional - and consequently unlawful - legislation (with the help of the "elected representatives" and President Mary McAleese), which, among several other things, permits PPP (public-private partnership) projects such as the M3 (Tara) and the N6 Upgrade (Turoe) Toll Roads to plough through what are probably the two most important sets of man-made heritage sites on the Island of Ireland. (Turoe appears to have been the Iron Age Capital of Ireland, and Tara appears to have been the Bronze Age Capital.)
 
Then, to round things off nicely, the legal profession (overall) ensure that nobody can successfully challenge their grossly corrupt activities - either in the courts of law, or anywhere else. In addition, and by way of "icing on the cake", it is also relatively easy for them, using plenty of surreptitious intimidation, to arrange for anybody who really gets in their way to be corruptly criminalised; and, if that fails, they can always force the person/s to leave the country (as in my own case): so that they have to live indefinitely in forced-exile, and without legal help, under the threat of being corruptly criminalised if they ever return, in addition to being imprisoned possibly.
 
At the same time, UNSUCCESSFUL challenges to the unconstitutional legislation in question are permitted of course, and in addition to be being very profitable for the lawyers who benefit financially, these costly "Punch & Judy" type farces also make for excellent "window dressing" - which is very easily swallowed (hook, line, and sinker) by a public which has little or no knowledge of the law, and which consequently can easily be tricked and "spun" into believing almost any kind of nonsense that the legal profession, and their "elected representative" public-servant mouthpieces deliver on their behalf for them.
 
If I remember correctly, the M3 (Tara) "challenge" in the High Court some time back between Vincent Salafia and Mr Justice Thomas Smythe cost the taxpayers something in the region of 600,000 Euros. A lot of good all that did, as can be seen from the photographs above. But, is Dr Gerard Hogan (Senior Lawyer) out of pocket in any way I wonder?
 
Anyway, things are changing slightly now for the "fat cats", in that they are being informed DIRECTLY about this particular set of problems - and in a very PUBLIC way: as can be seen at the following address:  http://www.europeancourtofhumanrightswilliamfinnerty.com/Media/31May2007/Email.htm .
 
As can also be seen at the above address, those informed TODAY about the present heritage situation at Tara (M3) and Turoe (N6) include Mr Peter Sutherland (Former Attorney General of the Republic of Ireland, Chairman of Goldman Sachs International Bank, and Steering Committee Member of the Bilderberg Group), and Chief Justice John L. Murray (Republic of Ireland).

In addition, the several "public servants" concerned have been informed in a manner whereby people like RTE's "Chief News Correspondent" Charlie Bird has been advised in a way that could be proved in a court of law later on (if necessary). Should people like Mr Bird continue to be silent on these crucially important constitutional and national heritage issues, and at the same time the present destruction at Tara continues, he may yet have to explain why he said nothing in any of his TV newscasts about them, and do so in a court of law perhaps. 

Before anybody rushes in and accuses me of imagining or inventing things, and with some considerable hesitation, I feel I should point out that I have many years experience of investigating problems relating to Quality Assurance matters, and that I have worked for some of the largest companies in the world (on a freelance basis) seeking out hidden flaws in their often very large and very complicated operating systems. Also, and in so far as I can recall, there has not been any case I have investigated (to date) where my overall conclusions turned out to be seriously in error.
 
One further point: in so far as I can establish, the legal profession has absolutely no overall Quality Assurance System WHATSOEVER in place at the present time in the Republic of Ireland. If it had a formal overall QA system in place, and if it was properly implemented, policed, and maintained, there is no way (in my view) that the two most important man-made heritage complexes in the Republic of Ireland jurisdiction would be under such threat for so long: and, please note, with absolutely no sign of a let-up, despite all the protests, letters to newspapers from the world's leading academics, the 600,000 Euros High Court "challenge", photographs on Indymedia, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. 
 
In so far as I can judge, either the legal profession is successfully challenged - very rapidly and very vigorously now - regarding the unconstitutional legislation they have saddled us all with during the past 10 years or so, or, many of the hugely important heritage sites close to the Hill of Tara (Meath) and the Hill of Turoe (Galway) will be lost, and they'll be lost forever - both to ourselves, and to our descendants. 
 
William Finnerty ( www.europeancourtofhumanrightswilliamfinnerty.com ) .
 
Related Link: www.constitutionofireland.com .
 
========================
 
The above text has been copied from the following Indymedia (Ireland) location:
http://www.indymedia.ie/article/82708&comment_limit=0&condense_comments=false#comment196220 .